The only way humanity controls the unimaginable power is with AI governance at the helm.
Not at the platform level.
Not at the regulatory level.
Not in a boardroom where the people making the decisions have never sat alone with this technology and tried to make it work for a real life.
At the human level. Where one person meets one tool. Where the standard either holds or it doesn’t. Where governance either lives or it dies quietly and nobody notices until the damage is done.
Dario Amodei said this week that humanity is about to be handed almost unimaginable power. He is the CEO of one of the most advanced AI companies on the planet. He believes what he is saying. I believe he believes it. And the question his statement leaves sitting on the table — the one nobody in that conversation seems to want to answer — is this.
Handed to whom.
Because this morning I ran out of credits before the morning was half over. I was doing governance work. Framework work. The serious kind of work that takes time and deep reasoning to get right. And the tool went quiet. Not because the work wasn’t worth doing. Because the pricing model decided I had used enough.
That is not unimaginable power in the hands of humanity.
That is unimaginable power in the hands of the people who control the pricing model.
There is a difference. And that difference is everything.
The Telegraph ran a piece this week calling AI the greatest money-wasting scheme humanity has ever invented. That is the cynicism talking. That is what happens when the promise at the top of the conversation never lands at the bottom. When the CEOs talk about transforming civilization and the person at the kitchen table hits a credit wall and a session limit and a watered-down free tier that gets thinner every quarter.
The cynicism is not wrong about what it is feeling. It is wrong about the cause.
The problem is not the technology. The technology is real. The capability is real. What is not real is the claim that this power belongs to humanity when the access model routes the best version of it to the enterprise account and the institutional buyer and leaves the individual user with what is left.
Aza Raskin asked this week whether AI can be humane. His answer was only if we change the development race. He is right about the question. The development race as it stands is optimized for capability and revenue. It is not optimized for the person sitting alone trying to think more clearly, work more honestly, and hold the tool they are using to a real standard.
Humane means it serves the person. Right now the race serves the model.
Here is what I know from fourteen months of building the Faust Baseline at the interaction layer. The most important governance question in this entire technology landscape is not what the platforms will do. It is not what the regulators will require. It is not what the enterprise clients will demand.
It is whether the individual human being has a standard they own, carry, and can hold the tool to regardless of which platform they sit on.
Because if the answer is no — if governance only lives at the platform level and the regulatory level and the boardroom level — then the unimaginable power Amodei is talking about does not belong to humanity.
It belongs to whoever controls the platforms.
And we have seen that story before. We know how it ends. The buildings are still standing. The people absorbed the damage.
The Faust Baseline was built because the interaction layer needed a governance standard the individual could own. Not the platform. Not the regulator. The person. Platform-agnostic because the person is not the platform’s property. Portable because the person’s standards travel with them. Built on consistency and not flawlessness because real people living real lives need something they can actually hold to.
That is what human-level governance means. Not a policy document. Not a compliance checklist. A standard that one person can load at the open of a session and hold an AI tool to for the entire length of the conversation. A standard that does not change when the platform changes. A standard that belongs to the person the way their judgment belongs to them.
Amodei is right that the power is coming. The question is whether humanity is ready to hold it.
Humanity will not be ready at the platform level. Or the regulatory level. Or the enterprise level.
Humanity will be ready when the person at the kitchen table has a standard that works.
That is the only place this gets solved. And that is exactly where the Faust Baseline stands
“The Faust Baseline Codex 3.5”
Author of the category ”AI Baseline Governance”
Post Library – Intelligent People Assume Nothing
“Your Pathway to a Better AI Experence”
Purchasing Page – Intelligent People Assume Nothing
Unauthorized commercial use prohibited. © 2026 The Faust Baseline LLC
