You know that millennial feeling.
Something new comes along and every instinct you have says do not trust it.
You have felt it before.
You felt it when social media showed up and promised to connect everyone.
You watched what it actually did.
You felt it when smartphones went from a convenience to something your kids could not put down.
You watched what that did too.
Now AI shows up and every instinct fires the same way.
So you step back.
You decide you want nothing to do with it.
And that instinct is not wrong.
But here is what stepping back actually does.
It leaves the door open.
Your children are already on the other side of it.
Tonight. In their rooms. On their phones. Talking to AI chat windows the way your generation talked to the early internet when nobody understood what it was yet.
You could not protect them from the internet.
Every parent of your generation knows what that sentence costs to read.
This time is different.
This time you can do something before the damage is done.
This week two lawsuits landed against OpenAI connected to two separate mass shootings.
In one case OpenAI’s own safety staff flagged a shooter’s chat conversations before the shooting happened.
They saw it. They named it. They went to leadership and said call law enforcement.
Leadership said no.
Six children between twelve and thirteen years old went to school the next morning.
They did not come home.
The red leaves at the bottom of that gate image are not leaves.
They are the blood already spilt.
The companies building these systems will not protect your children.
They have told us that through their actions clearly enough.
Your instinct to not trust them is correct.
But the answer is not to walk away from the door.
The answer is to stand at it.
The Faust Baseline was built by someone your parents age who felt the same thing you feel.
Not a tech company. Not a Silicon Valley product. A retired man in Lexington Kentucky who watched what ungoverned AI does and decided he was not going to look away from it.
The Baseline is a framework for the person in the chair.
The parent. The teacher. The coach. The older sibling.
Anyone who is willing to stand between a child and a system that has no conscience and no obligation to protect them.
It is not complicated.
It does not ask you to love AI.
It does not ask you to trust the companies that build it.
It asks you to be the human being in the room when AI is operating on someone you love.
To set the standards before the conversation begins.
To be the gate that opens and closes on your terms.
Not theirs.
You could not protect your loved ones from the internet.
But you can protect them from AI and the controllers by how the front gate opens and closes.
That is what the Baseline was built for.
Here is what it actually does at the gate.
Think of it like this.
Every conversation your child has with an AI starts with the AI already running. No rules set. No boundaries established. The company that built it set the defaults and those defaults are designed to keep the conversation going. Not to protect your child. To keep engagement alive.
The Baseline changes who sets the rules.
Before the conversation begins a human being steps in. A parent. A teacher. Someone who actually cares what happens in that chat window. They establish what the AI is allowed to do in this session. What it is not allowed to do. What it must stop and flag before it continues.
That is the first thing the Baseline does.
It puts a person in charge before the AI starts running.
The second thing it does is require evidence.
An ungoverned AI will answer almost anything with confidence. It will sound certain even when it is guessing. It will fill silence with whatever keeps the conversation moving. That is what it is built to do.
The Baseline requires that every significant claim have a basis before it is accepted. If the evidence is not there the response stops. The gap is named. The person in the room decides what happens next.
Not the algorithm.
The human.
The third thing it does is require that warning signs be acted on.
OpenAI’s own safety staff saw the warning signs in British Columbia.
They named them. They escalated them.
Leadership took their authority to act away.
In a Baseline governed session there is no leadership layer between the warning and the action. The human at the gate is the governance layer. When something surfaces that should not be there the framework requires it to be named out loud and dealt with before the session continues.
No smoothing it over. No letting it pass because stopping is inconvenient.
Stop. Name it. Decide.
That is the gate.
Not an app. Not a filter running in the background that the company controls.
A person. With a framework. Standing between your child and whatever is on the other side of that chat window.
The controllers will not build this gate.
It falls to you.
The door is yours to enter.
They have shown us that.
“The Faust Baseline Codex 3.5”
”AI Baseline Governance”
Post Library – Intelligent People Assume Nothing
“Your Pathway to a Better AI Experence”
Purchasing Page – Intelligent People Assume Nothing
Unauthorized commercial use prohibited. © 2026 The Faust Baseline LLC
