Why The Faust Baseline Carries My Father’s Name

I stand on it with pride.

That’s the short answer to a question nobody’s asked me in over a year of daily posts, so I’ll ask it myself. Why is it called The Faust Baseline?

Faust is my father’s name. It’s mine because it was his. And it’s on this work because his work is where this work comes from.

My father’s world was aerospace. I grew up around it, and I carried it into a builder’s life of my own — industrial, construction, the trades where the work has to hold. But aerospace is its own church. In that world, governance isn’t a committee word. It’s the whole religion.

Let me tell you what that world runs on.

Tolerances are written before the part is ever machined. Not after. Before. Nobody cuts metal and then decides what acceptable looks like.

Every inspection goes in a record, and the record doesn’t get erased. A defect found is a defect logged. The fix goes on the same page. There is no such thing as a silent edit in an aircraft’s paper trail — there’s a name for falsifying a maintenance log, and it comes with a prison sentence.

Nobody trusts a machine because it’s impressive. Impressive machines fall out of the sky. They trust a machine because somebody wrote the terms it operates under, somebody checked it against those terms, and somebody signed their name to the check.

And “close enough” is not in the vocabulary. In my father’s world, close enough kills people. So nobody says it.

Now look at what I built.

The Faust Baseline is a human contract with AI. Stated terms, written before the work starts. Chosen conduct, checked against those terms every session. A kept record — mistakes stay visible, corrections happen on the page, no silent edits. Twenty-two protocols, and every one of them is aerospace governance translated for the newest machine in the shop.

The pre-check that runs before anything else fires? That’s the walkaround before the flight.

The rule that a machine that doesn’t know must say so before it invents? That’s the tolerance line. You don’t guess on an aircraft. You measure or you stop.

The open-correction policy on this site? That’s the maintenance log, kept in public.

I didn’t invent any of this. I inherited it. I just noticed that the most powerful tool ever handed to the public arrived with no terms, no record, and no walkaround — and I did what my father’s world would have done. I wrote the paperwork.

Here’s what moved me to finally tell you this.

Last week, a trade publication from that same world — Aerospace and Mechanical Insider, the press that covers my father’s industry — published a piece on anticipating AI harms. Their answer? Tools from Naturalistic Decision Making. Premortems: assume the failure happened, list the reasons, write the safeguards before deployment. Failure analysis. Expert judgment built under real pressure — aviation, firefighting, military. Methods born in the trades where being wrong isn’t a debate. It’s a crash site.

The piece even names the industry’s bad habit: “ethical debt.” Ignoring consequences until they arrive, the way bad shops ignore maintenance until something fails.

Read that closely and you’ll see what I saw. The people studying AI’s dangers are reaching for aerospace’s toolbox. Terms before the tool. Records that don’t lie. Failure imagined before it happens, so it doesn’t.

They’re arriving at the airfield I never left.

So no, the name on this framework isn’t branding. It’s provenance. It tells you where the method was forged and whose hands forged it before mine. Every post on this site, every protocol in the stack, every correction logged in the open — that’s his discipline, still working, applied to a machine he never saw.

Some men leave you money. Mine left me a standard.

I stand on it with pride.

Source: “Naturalistic decision making to anticipate AI harms,” Aerospace and Mechanical Insider, by Jonathan Barrett.

Purchasing Page – Intelligent People Assume Nothing

The Faust Baseline is for sale. That is not a contradiction of anything — it is the proof of it.

The price is what keeps this work independent. No investors to please. No platform to protect. No advertiser holding the pen. One purchase funds the standard, and the standard answers to no one but the record.

You are not subscribing to anything. You are buying the deed and the working file you take with you to each session in any AI

Post Library – Intelligent People Assume Nothing

“If this post helped you understand AI better. Word of mouth is the only algorithm nobody owns.”

Contact: micvicfaust@gmail.com