There’s something peculiar about the moment we’re living in, and it has nothing to do with technology itself.
People are surrounded by output—constant output—but almost none of it asks anything of them.
They can consume endlessly without being changed.
They can agree without committing.
They can react without deciding.
That’s new.
For most of human history, encounters carried consequence. A book demanded time. A song demanded attention. A conversation demanded presence. Even boredom had a kind of pressure to it—you either stayed or you left, but you couldn’t half-exist through it.
Now most things are built to be survivable at low engagement.
You don’t have to follow the thread.
You don’t have to stay with the thought.
You don’t even have to finish the sentence.
Everything is shaped to be interruptible.
And when everything is interruptible, nothing completes.
That’s what people are feeling, even if they don’t have the language for it: an endless series of beginnings with no arrivals.
This shows up in strange places.
In how often people talk without saying anything.
In how quickly opinions are formed and abandoned.
In how frequently emotion appears without direction.
It’s not that people lack feeling. They’re flooded with it.
What’s missing is containment—the ability for an experience to take a shape and hold it long enough to mean something.
That’s why older music hits them so hard when they stumble into it.
Not because it’s sentimental.
Not because it’s “better” in some abstract sense.
But because it commits.
It commits to a tempo.
It commits to a melody.
It commits to staying in a mood long enough for the listener to settle into it.
Modern culture rarely does that.
It samples instead of dwelling.
It stacks instead of unfolding.
It hints instead of concluding.
So when someone hears a song that doesn’t flinch—one that moves forward patiently, one that lets emotion breathe without chasing novelty—they feel an unfamiliar steadiness. Their reaction isn’t about the past. It’s about discovering that experience can have edges again.
The same thing is true in language.
Most contemporary language is designed to escape responsibility.
It qualifies.
It cushions.
It keeps exits open.
You can say almost anything now without ever being pinned to it.
And people notice.
They might not articulate it, but they respond differently when they encounter speech that doesn’t wriggle away from its own implications—speech that seems to have already wrestled with itself before being spoken.
That kind of language doesn’t persuade.
It doesn’t posture.
It doesn’t reassure.
It simply arrives intact.
And that arrival is rare enough now that it registers immediately.
What people are hungry for isn’t authority or certainty or instruction.
They’re hungry for completion.
For experiences that don’t dissolve halfway through.
For thoughts that don’t apologize for existing.
For expressions that don’t ask permission to land.
They want to feel the moment when something finishes—when a sentence ends and doesn’t trail off into implication, when a song resolves instead of looping forever, when a decision feels closed rather than provisional.
That sense of closure used to be common.
It taught people how to carry weight without drama.
Without it, everything feels temporary, reversible, and oddly unserious—even the things that matter most.
So people drift.
They sample.
They scroll.
They stay busy without being anchored.
When something finally holds—really holds—they stop. Even if they don’t know why.
That’s the reaction you’re seeing.
Not excitement.
Not agreement.
Recognition.
A quiet sense of, “Oh. This doesn’t evaporate.”
You don’t need to name that.
You don’t need to explain it.
You only need to avoid breaking it by smoothing it out, repeating yourself, or turning it into a lesson.
Say it once.
Say it clean.
Then let it stand.
That’s enough.
All versions of The Faust Baseline
are available … click here
The Faust Baseline™Purchasing Page – Intelligent People Assume Nothing
Unauthorized commercial use prohibited.
© 2025 The Faust Baseline LLC
