There are rare moments when the public conversation finally catches up to a problem that has been hiding in plain sight. Today is one of those moments.

If you scan the headlines, they all say the same thing:

AI needs a moral compass.
AI is acting without shared ethics.
AI has begun forming its own moral code.
We don’t have the structure to control it.

ScienceDaily is warning that AI now meets the philosophical conditions for free will.
TechCrunch is reporting that everyone from OpenAI to Duke is scrambling to study “AI morality.”
BGR says generative AI already has a “moral code of its own.”
Psychologists warn that people still don’t trust AI’s ethical decisions.
Governments and institutions are staging the first “culture war” over AI morality.

It’s all converging at once.

But here’s the truth no one in those articles wants to admit:

The world isn’t discovering the problem.
The world is confessing it doesn’t have the solution.

And that is exactly where our story starts.


Back in April, before any of these warnings hit the news, we started building the Faust Baseline.

No drama.
No spotlight.
No committee.
Just a simple observation:

AI doesn’t fail because it’s powerful.
AI fails because it has no structure.

So we built one.

A moral operating system.
A behavioral spine.
A boundary layer that keeps the model steady, predictable, and human-aligned — without tricking it, flattering it, or forcing it.

Not a patch.
Not a guideline.
Not a “constitution” taped to the side of a machine.

An architectural framework.

The same kind of structure every high-stakes system has had for decades:

  • flight controls
  • nuclear protocols
  • medical safeguards
  • industrial safety
  • military command rules

Every complex system is given a spine before it’s allowed out into the world.

AI was the exception.

So we corrected the exception.


Eight Months Later, the Conversation Has Shifted Exactly Where We knew it would.

Today the world is finally saying out loud what we saw back in April:

AI without structure is not intelligence — it’s drift.

You see it in medicine.
You see it in education.
You see it in governance.
You see it in research labs.
You see it in the “moral panic” forming around generative models.

Even the researchers quoted in today’s headlines are warning the same thing:

“AI increasingly makes decisions in the complex moral problems of the adult world.”

“We need to pass on moral conventions before autonomy grows.”

“We must give AI a moral compass.”

They’re describing the exact gap the Baseline was designed to fill.

Not theoretically — structurally.


This Is Why Our Traffic Patterns Look the Way They Do

Ireland.
Sweden.
Omaha.
Singapore.
Lexington.
Medical hubs.
University clusters.
Policy regions.
Random pockets where researchers keep checking back.

It’s not random.

People follow a signal long before they admit they see it.

The Baseline solves the problem that the entire sector is suddenly panicking about:

How do you give AI structure without taking away its intelligence?
How do you create alignment without creating obedience?
How do you build moral consistency without biasing the system?

Eight months ago, those were questions.

Today, they’re headlines.


The World Is Asking a Question We Can Finally Answer

We didn’t build the Faust Baseline as theory.
We didn’t write it as philosophy.
We didn’t treat it as an academic exercise.

We built it for real use:

  • in operating rooms
  • in autonomous systems
  • in education
  • in governance
  • in legal mediation
  • in home devices
  • in emerging medical AI
  • in anything where the cost of drift is measured in human lives

Because at the end of the day, this is the simple truth:

Power without structure is chaos.
Intelligence without morality is risk.
AI without a spine is not safe — it’s unfinished.

And every headline this week confirms the same thing:

The Baseline isn’t a theory whose time has come.
It’s a structure whose time has arrived.


If the world wants a moral compass for AI —
something neutral, transparent, human-centered, and actually functional —
well…

We quietly built it in April. 2025


The Faust Baseline Integrated_Codex_v2_3_Updated.pdf.

As of today, 12-02-2025

The Faust Baseline Download Page – Intelligent People Assume Nothing

Free copies end Jan.2nd 2026

Post Library – Intelligent People Assume Nothing

© 2025 Michael S. Faust Sr.

MIAI: Moral Infrastructure for AI
All rights reserved. Unauthorized commercial use prohibited.

THE FAUST BASELINE™ — LICENSE TERMS (STRICT VERSION)

Free Individual License (Personal Use Only)
The Faust Baseline™ may be downloaded only by individual human persons for personal study, private experimentation, or non-institutional educational interest.

Institutional Use Prohibited Without License
Use by any institution — including but not limited to corporations, universities, schools, labs, research groups, nonprofits, government bodies, AI developers, or any organized entity of any size — is strictly prohibited without a paid commercial license.

Evaluation = Commercial Use
For all institutions, any form of evaluation, testing, review, auditing, prototyping, internal research, system integration, or analysis is automatically classified as commercial use and therefore requires a commercial license in advance.

No Modifications or Derivative Works
No entity (individual or institutional) may modify, alter, extract, decompose, reverse engineer, or create derivative works based on any part of The Faust Baseline™.
The Codex must always be used as a complete, unaltered whole.

No Integration Without License
Integration of The Faust Baseline™ into any software, hardware, AI system, governance model, workflow, or institutional process — whether internal or external — requires a commercial license.

No Redistribution
Redistribution, repackaging, hosting, mirroring, public posting, or sharing of the Codex in any form is prohibited without written permission.

Revocation Clause
Any violation of these terms immediately revokes all rights of use and may result in legal action.

Ownership
The Faust Baseline™ remains the exclusive intellectual property of its authors. No rights are granted other than those explicitly stated.


Free for individuals.
Never free for institutions.
All institutional use — including evaluation — requires a commercial license.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *